Stepping Stone #2

Jump hosts are typical used for remote access. These are controls: User accounts with multi-factor authenticationTime of day granted to this user accountRuleset to limit destination hosts when landed; and per login userSession monitoring On reasonable ground, some are mandatory while other extra measures depend. In extreme cases, multiple jump hosts are demanded that whether network latency, usability are at doubt. The optimal decision is to balance risk and usability with a hoslistic and objective assessment. Otherwise, it will be overkilled. ...
Read More

Access Control #4

From technology point of view of a discrete control, opening the bridge will disconnect the traffic across the sides. Is this barrier secure? It all depends how the entire protection system is run. The bridge will only block access via that land path. What about access is via air or water? By the same token, vulnerabilities in a computer platform or its underlying applications will not pose immediate cyber threat if it has its own surrounding effective electronic security perimeter. As professional cybersecurity practitioner, we have to reassure comfort to management rather than just follow text book knowledge to clear all known vulnerabilities. That is not practical to achieve. ...
Read More

Seasonal Factor #2

The Ice Road only opens Jan-Feb Anomalies detection highlights the technology will learn your environment as baseline reference such that "unusual" traffic will be flagged for alert. This will save detection ruleset definition but vendor always stresses short learning time (even just 1 or 2 weeks) to convince deployment for quick win demonstrating ROI. Sometimes, network traffic or application behaviors are seasonal based because of the business operations. Therefore as always, recurring maintenance efforts are required to sustain its effectiveness and don't be influenced by vendor for zero-deployment and zero-maintenance. ...
Read More

Coverage

Security technology alone cannot reassure protection. It requires human judgment: What is the value of target being protected? Risks to low value asset or low business impact are simply accepted as part of the operating cost. Example is the anti-theft RFiD tags.How is the controls deployed? Is the control in place properly? Gap in control will leave a loop-hole.Most importantly, how is the control operated and sustained to maintain its effectiveness? Adding controls does not increase security sometimes but incur unnecessary overheads or activities that overkill the purpose. A comprehensive assessment from design, build, deploy, regular validation is required through out the life cycle of the deployed cybersecurity protection. ...
Read More

Dynamic Policy

Written directives for cybersecurity are getting more challenges to formulate into policies due to dynamic business nature. If too rigid, compliance will be an issue. If too loose, then forget it because the policies won't stipulate specific protection. Eventually, policy statement will be conditional. Instead of laying down business logic, precise specific protection is stated for generic situation. An example is information protection regarding credit card transaction. If transaction value exceeds defined threshold, further check is needed for authorization. This will be implemented in the system and the defined threshold will be per cardholder's spending profile, usual spending location, repayment history etc. The zero-trust access model is taking similar approach to grant access in further strengthening critical information asset assess. Last but not the least, technical enforcement can always be defeated or circumvented by human factor and usage behavior. That's why raising situation awareness and workforce competency development are important to invest rather than solely narrow focused on...
Read More

Unnecessary Control #2

Control must be enforceable. If control can be circumvented or bypassed, then there is no point to deploy such control. That's why we need to keep updating the system, infrastructure to sustain their effectiveness over time due to emerging threats are out. There are many examples out there in the cyber world. Attack and defense are competing each other. Once in the digital journey, allocate resources to address multiple aspects to stay secure: Collect threat intelligence and their impacts to own environmentAssess operation risks to prioritize protectionMaintain workforce competency and situation awarenessRefresh technology obsolescenceEstablish achievable and enforceable cybersecurity directives ...
Read More

Full Coverage

Traffic camera is only deployed at risky locations to detect unsafe driving behavior but not everywhere This time, I talk about auditor instead of cybersecurity practitioner that I have come across. In an ICS audit, auditor has questioned why the deployed anomalies detection does not have full coverage of all devices. This will impose cyber risks due to malicious traffic cannot be detect early. Despite thorough elaboration with the following rationales, auditor is still not satisfied: The ICS is isolated from the Internet and not even any other peer ICSWithin the ICS, the plant units are further zoned in the network such that cyber threats are contained prohibiting lateral movement to compromise the entire ICSThe ICS is hardened with removable media lock downOutgoing process information data to other the repository in the ICS network is thru unidirectional gateway enforcing push out to avoid reverse TCP attack in the case of stateful network firewallFull coverage will have only very a small gain in detection capability...
Read More

Perimeter

When you move the contents to the cloud, it is above the perimeter. Even if you are pretty sure you have the dedicated cloud environment allocated, configuration issues, physical security and human factors could endanger your contents in the cloud. Cyber protections must be imposed properly: access control and management, encryption of all 3 data states (data-in-use, data-in-motion, data-at-rest) and most importantly the key management process. ...
Read More

Administrative Control

Certain cybersecurity practitioners insist to impose technical controls to secure the infrastructure/system. To some degrees yes, basic technical controls will prohibit human error or low skill attacks. Adding technical controls will never secure the infrastructure/system more. At some points, more controls will even degrade the security due to a number of issues: People will find ways to circumvent controls because affecting productivity (writing down complex password)New control might introduce new system weaknessExtra efforts are required to sustain the control effectiveness (upgrade, backup, other housekeeping tasks: patch, patch, patch ...) These are always the neglected elements. Sometimes, exercise administrative control will enforce discipline internally while externally relying laws & regulations. ...
Read More

Seasonal Factor

There are network anomaly detection technologies to alert abnormal network traffic of potential cyberattack. The pre-requisite is let the technology learn the current network traffic pattern as baseline profile. Then anything outside this profile boundary will be treated as anomalies and triggers alert. It is a great technology - no signature or definition update for zero TCO maintenance. All are self-sustained. However, the key question is how long should the technology acquire the correct baseline profile? Some vendors claim just one or two weeks suffices. Really? Even with 80/20 rule, such short duration shall generate many false alerts that eventually affecting confidence. Realistically, duration in a year for setting up the baseline profile deems necessary to fully cover the normal traffic. After all, human perception especially senior management is important for successful deployment. A KPI dashboard shall provide visibility of the value of the technology. Last but not the least, network anomalies detection is just one layer of defense. We should strengthen...
Read More